<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: European Moslems aim for Laws agains Defamation of Religions</title>
	<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/</link>
	<description>Free and open</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Hajja Romi</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-1047</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:03:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-1047</guid>
					<description>Why is it against the law in Europe to deny the Holocaust, but not to defame Islam?

In fact, European laws are biased IN FAVOR OF Zionism and Israel, but discriminate against Muslims.

If you want free speech, then it should be legal to question the Holocaust.  Otherwise, Europeans prove once again that they are RACIST, against Muslims, who are suffering a genocide in Iraq and Afganistan as brutal as anything Hitler did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Why is it against the law in Europe to deny the Holocaust, but not to defame Islam?</p>
	<p>In fact, European laws are biased IN FAVOR OF Zionism and Israel, but discriminate against Muslims.</p>
	<p>If you want free speech, then it should be legal to question the Holocaust.  Otherwise, Europeans prove once again that they are RACIST, against Muslims, who are suffering a genocide in Iraq and Afganistan as brutal as anything Hitler did.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joy</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-1046</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-1046</guid>
					<description>nice posting
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gaypedia.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gay&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>nice posting<br />
<a href="http://www.gaypedia.com/" rel="nofollow">Gay</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Parantar</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-1043</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:57:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-1043</guid>
					<description>i thought Europeans are all christians</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i thought Europeans are all christians
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: redfern8</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-1006</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:32:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-1006</guid>
					<description>Here in America, we struck the appropriate balance a couple of centuries ago:

&quot;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&quot;

--Amendment 1, Constitution of the United States of America.

This issue must be clarified.  Islam is a religion, NOT a race.  (IMO, the fact that Islam welcomes people of all races is one of the few positive aspects of Islam.)  Islam may be a lot of things, but it is not and cannot be racist.  Similarly, criticism of Islam is not and cannot be racist.  

This is not a complicated concept, yet the world is full of well-educated people who don't seem to grasp it.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Here in America, we struck the appropriate balance a couple of centuries ago:</p>
	<p>&#8220;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&#8221;</p>
	<p>&#8211;Amendment 1, Constitution of the United States of America.</p>
	<p>This issue must be clarified.  Islam is a religion, NOT a race.  (IMO, the fact that Islam welcomes people of all races is one of the few positive aspects of Islam.)  Islam may be a lot of things, but it is not and cannot be racist.  Similarly, criticism of Islam is not and cannot be racist.  </p>
	<p>This is not a complicated concept, yet the world is full of well-educated people who don&#8217;t seem to grasp it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Miep</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-999</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-999</guid>
					<description>A follow-up to the cartoons issue:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/E733C279-7477-4B33-AFD7-3F4E2911BF39.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A follow-up to the cartoons issue:<br />
<a href='http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/E733C279-7477-4B33-AFD7-3F4E2911BF39.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/E733C279-7477-4B33-AFD7-3F4E2911BF39.htm</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: holger danske</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-996</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-996</guid>
					<description>dear friends,

i added you to my blogroll...
all the best

holger danske
http://europenews.blogg.de
europenews@web.de


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>dear friends,</p>
	<p>i added you to my blogroll&#8230;<br />
all the best</p>
	<p>holger danske<br />
<a href='http://europenews.blogg.de' rel='nofollow'>http://europenews.blogg.de</a><br />
<a href="mailto:europenews@web.de">europenews@web.de</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ADAM</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-962</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:12:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-962</guid>
					<description>First, a point to the administrator: you should (or rather should have long ago) delete the comments about outlawing Islam and nuking Mecca. 
Now, for the news itself: the enforcemnt mechanisms for any such law would be by suing (civil law), except in extreme cases where other laws were probably broken too. Obviously, were every instance of an infraction of the proposed &quot;disrespect to religion&quot; laws to be sued, there would be two results (1) the courts would be clogged and (2) the citizenry would want the law revoked on account of preposterous suits being filed, and the increases in tensions with the Islamic communities it would doubtless contribute to. But, having said this, over time, things would eventually balance out: some disrespect would be disallowed either by law (if not revoked but only weakened), or by custom. So the question boils down to: would (or should) the citizenry accept such a weak restriction on their speech? That is their responsibilty to decide. But to stupidly insult - as opposed to incisively jab - anything, a religion, a theory, or a party, is not something really worth protecting, is it? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>First, a point to the administrator: you should (or rather should have long ago) delete the comments about outlawing Islam and nuking Mecca.<br />
Now, for the news itself: the enforcemnt mechanisms for any such law would be by suing (civil law), except in extreme cases where other laws were probably broken too. Obviously, were every instance of an infraction of the proposed &#8220;disrespect to religion&#8221; laws to be sued, there would be two results (1) the courts would be clogged and (2) the citizenry would want the law revoked on account of preposterous suits being filed, and the increases in tensions with the Islamic communities it would doubtless contribute to. But, having said this, over time, things would eventually balance out: some disrespect would be disallowed either by law (if not revoked but only weakened), or by custom. So the question boils down to: would (or should) the citizenry accept such a weak restriction on their speech? That is their responsibilty to decide. But to stupidly insult - as opposed to incisively jab - anything, a religion, a theory, or a party, is not something really worth protecting, is it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-959</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:52:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-959</guid>
					<description>Unfortunately, yes. His name is Frank Aaen, a member of the moonbat Unity List, the successor to the Danish Communist Party, the Communist Workers' Party and a bunch of other moonbat nut-case parties. His request was denied. For more info, see:
http://exile-onthewing.blogspot.com/2006/08/learned-idiot-to-left-of-me_29.html
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red-Green_Alliance_(Denmark)&quot;&gt;Unity List&lt;/a&gt;

Regards,
Agora</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Unfortunately, yes. His name is Frank Aaen, a member of the moonbat Unity List, the successor to the Danish Communist Party, the Communist Workers&#8217; Party and a bunch of other moonbat nut-case parties. His request was denied. For more info, see:<br />
<a href='http://exile-onthewing.blogspot.com/2006/08/learned-idiot-to-left-of-me_29.html' rel='nofollow'>http://exile-onthewing.blogspot.com/2006/08/learned-idiot-to-left-of-me_29.html</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red-Green_Alliance_(Denmark)">Unity List</a></p>
	<p>Regards,<br />
Agora
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Miep</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-958</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:33:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-958</guid>
					<description>Is this true?

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/69036BFC-BA8E-462A-9565-24D1998365AF.htm

What is his or her name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Is this true?</p>
	<p><a href='http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/69036BFC-BA8E-462A-9565-24D1998365AF.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/69036BFC-BA8E-462A-9565-24D1998365AF.htm</a></p>
	<p>What is his or her name?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CT</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-955</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:01:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-955</guid>
					<description>Why be tolerant towards the intolerant?

www.safiaaoude.blogspot.com

A radical muslim in denmark, that makes it harder for ordinary muslims to just live a regular life...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Why be tolerant towards the intolerant?</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.safiaaoude.blogspot.com' rel='nofollow'>www.safiaaoude.blogspot.com</a></p>
	<p>A radical muslim in denmark, that makes it harder for ordinary muslims to just live a regular life&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: beth</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-869</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 02:16:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-869</guid>
					<description>&quot;indefinite leave. When something comes up, perhaps I will post about it.&quot;

While I miss your posts, wouldn't it be nice if nothing came up :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;indefinite leave. When something comes up, perhaps I will post about it.&#8221;</p>
	<p>While I miss your posts, wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if nothing came up <img src='http://agora.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Nargizian</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-860</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:09:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-860</guid>
					<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dailyscorecard.blogspot.com/2006/04/comedy-central-south-park-wimp-out-and.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;COMEDY CENTRAL SOUTH PARK WIMP OUT AND TRY TO COVER&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Go to the video lonks of the 2 shows on Mohammed and the show on Scientology. Although Comedy Cnetral wimped out and didn't show the image of Mohammed they still aggressively and succesfully mock the controversy in the show.
The show on Scientology is so funny you'll piss your pants.

Regards....

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><b><a href="http://dailyscorecard.blogspot.com/2006/04/comedy-central-south-park-wimp-out-and.html" rel="nofollow">COMEDY CENTRAL SOUTH PARK WIMP OUT AND TRY TO COVER</a></b></p>
	<p>Go to the video lonks of the 2 shows on Mohammed and the show on Scientology. Although Comedy Cnetral wimped out and didn&#8217;t show the image of Mohammed they still aggressively and succesfully mock the controversy in the show.<br />
The show on Scientology is so funny you&#8217;ll piss your pants.</p>
	<p>Regards&#8230;.</p>
	<p>Mike
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pst314</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-859</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:06:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-859</guid>
					<description>Agora is a very good blog, so we'll be pleased if you can resume posting some day, but in the meantime enjoy your vacation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Agora is a very good blog, so we&#8217;ll be pleased if you can resume posting some day, but in the meantime enjoy your vacation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-858</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:44:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-858</guid>
					<description>indefinite leave. When something comes up, perhaps I will post about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>indefinite leave. When something comes up, perhaps I will post about it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: beth</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-856</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:19:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-856</guid>
					<description>Agora, I hope you are on vacation and will return. I've missed your posts the last couple of weeks. Everything okay?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Agora, I hope you are on vacation and will return. I&#8217;ve missed your posts the last couple of weeks. Everything okay?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Anti-Jihad Pundit</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-849</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:45:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-849</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Crazy Cartoonist's Last Work&lt;/strong&gt;

(Tak til Rackham)HT: NO PASARÁN.I'm going to link one of Agora's posts:. It's from some ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>The Crazy Cartoonist&#8217;s Last Work</strong></p>
	<p>(Tak til Rackham)HT: NO PASARÁN.I&#8217;m going to link one of Agora&#8217;s posts:. It&#8217;s from some &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foreign devil</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-840</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 23:09:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-840</guid>
					<description>The essay from the vatican to which you refer at the link you gave is called &quot;The Islamic Question&quot; and begins halfway down the page.

http://www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=48741&amp;amp;eng=y

It's an excellent read and both authors are admirers of Orianna Fallaci, as is the new Pope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The essay from the vatican to which you refer at the link you gave is called &#8220;The Islamic Question&#8221; and begins halfway down the page.</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=48741&amp;eng=y' rel='nofollow'>http://www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=48741&amp;eng=y</a></p>
	<p>It&#8217;s an excellent read and both authors are admirers of Orianna Fallaci, as is the new Pope.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sveitserosten</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-839</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:33:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-839</guid>
					<description>Next news also from Italy:
The text only in german but I can translate the short text:
&quot;The murderer of the catholic priest Andrea Santoro in Turkia should go to prison for 26 years and 8 month. The 16 year old turkish confessed to have shot the priest in the church of Trabazon on february 5. An eye-witness said she had seen the 16 years old  shouting ' Allahu Akbar' (Allah is great) bevore shooting the priest. The authorities think it is a murderer motivated by the islamic faith.&quot;

The original article can be found here:
www.oecumene.radiovaticana.org/ted/Articolo.asp?c=74649
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Next news also from Italy:<br />
The text only in german but I can translate the short text:<br />
&#8220;The murderer of the catholic priest Andrea Santoro in Turkia should go to prison for 26 years and 8 month. The 16 year old turkish confessed to have shot the priest in the church of Trabazon on february 5. An eye-witness said she had seen the 16 years old  shouting &#8216; Allahu Akbar&#8217; (Allah is great) bevore shooting the priest. The authorities think it is a murderer motivated by the islamic faith.&#8221;</p>
	<p>The original article can be found here:<br />
<a href='http://www.oecumene.radiovaticana.org/ted/Articolo.asp?c=74649' rel='nofollow'>www.oecumene.radiovaticana.org/ted/Articolo.asp?c=74649</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sveitserosten</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-838</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:13:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-838</guid>
					<description>I have found an article in an italien newspaper that has nothing to do with Danish politics but is a statement from Rome.
It is a critical analysis made by a (gesuita = ) Jesuit priest (maybe 'monk' is better). 
I post the link  here as a 'positive news' because I think we need that. The article was published already one week ago, now also available in english here:
www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=48741&amp;amp;eng=y


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have found an article in an italien newspaper that has nothing to do with Danish politics but is a statement from Rome.<br />
It is a critical analysis made by a (gesuita = ) Jesuit priest (maybe &#8216;monk&#8217; is better).<br />
I post the link  here as a &#8216;positive news&#8217; because I think we need that. The article was published already one week ago, now also available in english here:<br />
<a href='http://www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=48741&amp;eng=y' rel='nofollow'>www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=48741&amp;eng=y</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: prophet mohammed (pbum)</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-837</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:15:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-837</guid>
					<description>unless my followers decide to behave themselves i shall have to convert to infidelism... i wish they would just do what i say in my most official website ... http://www.prophetmohammed.co.uk </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>unless my followers decide to behave themselves i shall have to convert to infidelism&#8230; i wish they would just do what i say in my most official website &#8230; <a href='http://www.prophetmohammed.co.uk' rel='nofollow'>http://www.prophetmohammed.co.uk</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foreign devil</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-834</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:46:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-834</guid>
					<description>sveitserosten:

Thank you for that translation.  It IS good news.  But remain vigilant anyway.  They have a tendency to say one thing for public consumption and then say something else to each other.  As for your English--it's excellent.  Many thanks for that news.  If it's not a ruse and it true, maybe they're finally realizing we won't quit either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>sveitserosten:</p>
	<p>Thank you for that translation.  It IS good news.  But remain vigilant anyway.  They have a tendency to say one thing for public consumption and then say something else to each other.  As for your English&#8211;it&#8217;s excellent.  Many thanks for that news.  If it&#8217;s not a ruse and it true, maybe they&#8217;re finally realizing we won&#8217;t quit either.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Coalition of the Swilling</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-831</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:30:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-831</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;On a Lighter Note&lt;/strong&gt;

“It is high time now that Muslims in Europe pressed for their rights like enacting laws banning aggression on Islam and enhancing Islamic education”. Agora's covering an interesting convention. It would appear to be a &quot;Shriners Free&quot; affair, jud...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>On a Lighter Note</strong></p>
	<p>“It is high time now that Muslims in Europe pressed for their rights like enacting laws banning aggression on Islam and enhancing Islamic education”. Agora&#8217;s covering an interesting convention. It would appear to be a &#8220;Shriners Free&#8221; affair, jud&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sveitserosten</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-825</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:20:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-825</guid>
					<description>Here are some good news - from Jyllands Posten:
Moslem countries give up
(...)
I am translating right now the text, but here  in short the result of this 
meeting in Paris:
'The word 'resposibility' has been given up, because the next question would be: responsible towards whom?
At the same time the moslem organisation OIC gave up its claim (or: 'demand' in english) to push a konvention which should protect all religions from freedom of speech while demanding for sanctions (= punishment) towards respectlessness.
(sorry - bad english)
Original text here:
http://www.jp.dk/indland/artikel:aid=3673894/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Here are some good news - from Jyllands Posten:<br />
Moslem countries give up<br />
(&#8230;)<br />
I am translating right now the text, but here  in short the result of this<br />
meeting in Paris:<br />
&#8216;The word &#8216;resposibility&#8217; has been given up, because the next question would be: responsible towards whom?<br />
At the same time the moslem organisation OIC gave up its claim (or: &#8216;demand&#8217; in english) to push a konvention which should protect all religions from freedom of speech while demanding for sanctions (= punishment) towards respectlessness.<br />
(sorry - bad english)<br />
Original text here:<br />
<a href='http://www.jp.dk/indland/artikel:aid=3673894/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.jp.dk/indland/artikel:aid=3673894/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: foreign devil</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-822</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:31:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-822</guid>
					<description>This attempt to harness the laws of free speech must, once again, be defended.  The Islamists will keep coming at us and we must remain vigilant.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This attempt to harness the laws of free speech must, once again, be defended.  The Islamists will keep coming at us and we must remain vigilant.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HELLPIG</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-818</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:09:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-818</guid>
					<description>Nuking Mecca sound better eveyday does it not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nuking Mecca sound better eveyday does it not?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Nordish Portal</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-817</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:13:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-817</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;&amp;#8216;ANTI-MUSLIM BIAS TOO HIGH&amp;#8217; - VIENNA CONFERENCE&lt;/strong&gt;

The head of the EU&amp;#8217;s racism observatory on Saturday, April 8, told the second conference of European imams, bringing together 300 leaders, imams and female preachers from 35 countries, that anti-Muslim bias is dangerously high in Europe. Full art...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>&#8216;ANTI-MUSLIM BIAS TOO HIGH&#8217; - VIENNA CONFERENCE</strong></p>
	<p>The head of the EU&#8217;s racism observatory on Saturday, April 8, told the second conference of European imams, bringing together 300 leaders, imams and female preachers from 35 countries, that anti-Muslim bias is dangerously high in Europe. Full art&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-815</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:20:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-815</guid>
					<description>Let's have laws to outlaw Islam. It advocates racism. Dhimmis have fewer rights than believers, polygamy is ok, but polyandry is not. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Let&#8217;s have laws to outlaw Islam. It advocates racism. Dhimmis have fewer rights than believers, polygamy is ok, but polyandry is not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: KGS59</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-814</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 15:05:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-814</guid>
					<description>I agree. The slippery slope has just been encountered with Europe already struggling to maintain its footing. Europe  should be kicking the Islamists head first down that same slope, instead of preparing themselves to bow before their Islamist masters.

Islamist Hegemony   1
Liberal Dem. Europe 0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree. The slippery slope has just been encountered with Europe already struggling to maintain its footing. Europe  should be kicking the Islamists head first down that same slope, instead of preparing themselves to bow before their Islamist masters.</p>
	<p>Islamist Hegemony   1<br />
Liberal Dem. Europe 0
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sveitserosten</title>
		<link>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-812</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:36:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/european-moslems-aim-for-laws-agains-defamation-of-religions/#comment-812</guid>
					<description>I have read this in Jyllandsposten:
&quot;&quot; Lykkes det ikke at nå til enighed, og skaffes der ved en afstemning flertal for de muslimske landes udspil, er Unesco forpligtet til at følge beslutningen og udarbejde en international konvention, som dog ikke vil have virkning for de lande, der ikke underskriver den.&quot;&quot;

So I still hope that there are countries that will NOT  sign  this convention.
JP's article: http://www.jp.dk/indland/artikel:aid=3667202/

But after reading the article you have linked above:
http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2006-04/08/article06.shtml
I do fear the worst case ...
Or could anyone give me some hope ? 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have read this in Jyllandsposten:<br />
&#8220;&#8221; Lykkes det ikke at nå til enighed, og skaffes der ved en afstemning flertal for de muslimske landes udspil, er Unesco forpligtet til at følge beslutningen og udarbejde en international konvention, som dog ikke vil have virkning for de lande, der ikke underskriver den.&#8221;"</p>
	<p>So I still hope that there are countries that will NOT  sign  this convention.<br />
JP&#8217;s article: <a href='http://www.jp.dk/indland/artikel:aid=3667202/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.jp.dk/indland/artikel:aid=3667202/</a></p>
	<p>But after reading the article you have linked above:<br />
<a href='http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2006-04/08/article06.shtml' rel='nofollow'>http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2006-04/08/article06.shtml</a><br />
I do fear the worst case &#8230;<br />
Or could anyone give me some hope ?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
